Not much of a counter

If rumble was originally in the PS, then why did Emmersion sue Sony for it? 

As for online, it took Microsoft may years to get to where they are now. I don't expect Sony to be there soon.  As I stated, I am willing to pay for a better online experience.  If every non-Sony publisher/developer starts charging PS3 customers for online gameplay, the fees will add up.

I've played Gears of War and I've seen amazing A.I. and physics.  But then again, I get bored with playing the Campaign mode once I'm finished with it.  A.I. will always be A.I.  That's why I play online with real people and real intelligence and real competition.  My CPU doesn't need extra horsepower to deal with A.I. because there's no A.I. to deal with online.

You're telling me that a graphics card (or not a card at all according to you) using DX9 is better than a card having almost DX10 specs with unified shader architecture.  I don't think so.  The PS3 may have more raw horsepower but the Xbox 360 is more efficient.  I pick efficiency over raw horsepower.

Exclusives? Developing a game cost alot now with Hi-Def and to be exclusive mostly spells disaster unless there's enough fanbase.  Did I mention that some games that were thought to be exclusive to the PS3 are now coming to the Xbox 360.  The games that you mention exclusive, if they are, may be cross platform one day.  The future may not be all that exclusive. 

I guess we both agree that Blu-ray is only a higher form of storage now that you've made that clear.  I also want to restate that filling up 25 gigs of game data is very costly.  Filling up a DVD-9 disc already costs millions and is costing us $60 a pop.  Imagine filling up a Blu-ray disc.  The games would cost us over $100.  Development costs only go up, not down.

So Microsoft and Wii are stupid because they both rely on memory cards and they don't have endless possibilities.  The PS3 requires a HDD because their game load times would be "rediculously" long.  The data reading on the DVD drive in the Xbox 360 is alot faster than the Blu-ray drive in the PS3.  This is why the Xbox 360 doesn't need a HDD built in.  May I also mention that the Xbox 360 has the option to add a HDD or replace it with a larger one in the future.  "It's all about options"

What about replacing the controller battery or having to connect a wire to recharge or having no rumble?  Now this was a stupid decision from Sony.

I am bashing Sony as a company and their PR.  My original argument is "It's all about options" and that the PS3 is not exceptionally or "rediculously" better as you put it.

Sources
This argument has no sources attached.

Posted by jn Unregistered

Views: 122     Votes: 0

Share