Still comparing PS3 with Xbox 360?

It still amazes me how wonderfully easy it is for companies such as Sony and Microsoft to persuade people into camps. They compare system specs of one unit over the other. Does anyone remember the 3DO? I do. I bought one for $575 plus tax back in 1994. Remember how advanced the unit specs was compared to the SNES and Genesis, and how Doom on the SNES was better that the 3DO version and the 32X? I know that the SNES was using the additional FX chip, but this is besides the point. Look at the last Gods of War on the PS2. Do you think anyone would have imagined that such a title could be made on the PS2 during its first generaton? No. Clever and creative developers who know the attributes of systems learn the tricks of creating great graphics, effects and games...so drop the hardware spec's between the Xbox 360 and PS3. It doesn't really matter.



An Atari 2600 cost a friend of mine back in the day $450...he paid over $100 dollars for 2600 pacman, which totally sucked...my dad bought me an Atari 2600 in 1982 for $280(price drop) plus tax...it cost Warner 100 million dollars to research and development the Atari 2600...so what the heck is $400 today...it's like buying a small bag of chips and a pop everyday for 1/2 a year! Great exclusive titles are starting to surface on the Xbox 360, PS3 and the Wii. The amount of money spent in making current titles is so much that this generation will find less exclusives than ever before. However, if there happens to be a game only on a PS3, Xbox 360 or Wii that you like, stop buying pop and chips for a while and buy the system...I own everything I want except for a PS3...I may ironically buy one of them some day...if I ever find an exclusive that I really want.



Stop comparing, buy what you like and don't get pressured by what one system has or has not!

Sources
This argument has no sources attached.

Posted by misterc Unregistered

Views: 113     Votes: 0

Share